Countering Iran’s Threat, Strategies for Regional Stability

-
Image
  Written by Mahmoud Hakamian Two-minute read On Sunday morning, April 14, the Iranian regime launched an unprecedented attack against Israel, escalating tensions in the Middle East. Despite military experts’ assessments that the attack failed, it underscores  Iran’s role as a focal point  of regional conflict. The October 7th attack sent shockwaves globally. Despite ample evidence implicating the Iranian regime, Western governments dismissed Tehran’s involvement, adhering to a flawed appeasement policy toward the primary state sponsor of terrorism. They disregarded explicit statements from Revolutionary Guards  (IRGC) commanders boasting  about their direct role in the attack. For decades, the Iranian Resistance has urged the international community to adopt a resolute stance against the Iranian regime’s aggression and terrorism. Despite persistent calls, the failed appeasement policy of the West allowed Tehran to escalate its belligerent activities, including financing, arming, train
Post a Comment

Iran, the JCPOA and the unknown

-
Analysis by PMOI/MEK
PMOI, April 27, 2018 - The three day visit by French President Emmanuel Macron to the U.S. and his talks with his American counterpart Donald Trump came to an end after mainly focusing on the Iran nuclear agreement and how to resolve the existing crisis of Washington threatening to abandon ship on the accord.
The result of this visit has been the subject of a variety of analysis from different viewpoints. Foreign outlets and state media in Iran are running the same line of thought. The end result is that one cannot come to a firm conclusion about the outcome of Macron’s talks with Trump, and how will the U.S. President decide come his May 12th deadline.
No official statement or newsletter has been published as of yet, otherwise we would not be witness to such a conglomerate of perspectives. Trump is always answering with terms such as, “You will see” or everything will be resolved May 12th.
Reactions from inside Iran are also derived from different standpoints. Tehran first expected Europe to place small and hardly meaningful concessions before Trump, in a tactic similar to the Obama years, all aimed at bringing calm to the U.S. administration’s demands. Developments, however, show that Europe’s suggestions are quite serious and there is word of Iran giving up its ballistic missile program and Middle East influence.
Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, in a recent speech in Tabriz, resorted to brouhaha and even mocked the U.S. President. These remarks have the potential of backfiring and we cannot come to a final understanding what Iran may have actually received, if anything in fact, from the Trump-Macron talks.
Rouhani’s remarks can lead us to a conclusion that Iran will abandon the JCPOA if the U.S. takes such measures. It goes without a doubt that Tehran is terrified of Trump’s possible decision to exit the JCPOA. Iran attempted to signal its willingness to provide encouraging concessions, including the release of American hostages imprisoned in Iran.
Although why do the U.S. and Europe on one hand, and Iran on the other, refuse to specifically describe the status quo and what their final decision may be?
As far as Tehran is concerned, it is forced to choose between bad and worse. Considering the fact that there are no grounds for a deal with the U.S., Rouhani’s remarks are very cautions and paving the path to thus claim of a win-win end result being out of the question for Iran.
The U.S. and Europe are not willing to show their hands, thus increasing the pressure on Iran’s regime. This comes as their announced intentions are aimed at increasing pressure on Tehran, knowing this limbo status will render major crises amongst the regime’s ranks and files, placing it before an unknown future. These pressures are set to further increase after May 12th.
Of course, in his last remarks Macron said it appears Trump has no interest to remain in the JCPOA. He did, however, emphasize the fact that this is his personal opinion and provided no final result of his talks with Trump.
One can imagine that this is also part of the same pressure strategy to send a message to the Iranian regime that the road ahead will be very slippery and full of unknowns.
Tehran is now placing its hopes on German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Friday visit to Washington. It is, however, safe to say that Macron discussed his game plan with his European partners prior to his Washington visit and that he enjoys the best relationship with Trump among all of Europe’s leaders.
If he couldn’t convince Trump, does Merkel stand a chance? Or anyone else for that matter?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

General Call for Signing a Statement on the Investigation of Killers of the Massacre of Prisoners

-
Image
Link to call signing: https://www.change.org/p/un-secretary-general-call-for-justice-for-the-1988-iran-massacre Let's move our hands to change our world In the age of consciousness, and in the 21st century, brutality and barbarism must be stopped, this is not worthy of humanity. At the first step, you should be the center of this cruelty and the godfather of crime and murder, terrorism and fundamentalism that nobody is part of Iran's terrorist government. The fact is that the killing and execution of political and conscientious prisoners in public or in prisons is secretly in its astronomical dimensions on the coin of killing innocent people abroad by this regime. The issuance of terrorism and the support of fundamentalist and terrorist groups in this regime is institutionalized and is part of the constitution. The crimes committed by perpetrators and groups affiliated with this corrupt and expansionist state in Syria and Lebanon and Iraq
Read more

Countering Iran’s Threat, Strategies for Regional Stability

-
Image
  Written by Mahmoud Hakamian Two-minute read On Sunday morning, April 14, the Iranian regime launched an unprecedented attack against Israel, escalating tensions in the Middle East. Despite military experts’ assessments that the attack failed, it underscores  Iran’s role as a focal point  of regional conflict. The October 7th attack sent shockwaves globally. Despite ample evidence implicating the Iranian regime, Western governments dismissed Tehran’s involvement, adhering to a flawed appeasement policy toward the primary state sponsor of terrorism. They disregarded explicit statements from Revolutionary Guards  (IRGC) commanders boasting  about their direct role in the attack. For decades, the Iranian Resistance has urged the international community to adopt a resolute stance against the Iranian regime’s aggression and terrorism. Despite persistent calls, the failed appeasement policy of the West allowed Tehran to escalate its belligerent activities, including financing, arming, train
Read more

Paris Conference Demands Justice for Victims of Iran’s 1988 Massacre and Accountability for Regime Officials

-
Image
  Written by Shamsi Saadati A conference held in Paris on August 21, 2023, commemorated the 35th anniversary of the 1988 massacre of 30,000 political prisoners in Iran. Titled “Four Decades of Crime against Humanity and Impunity from Punishment,” the event gathered esteemed international judges and jurists from all around the world. In her  opening remarks ,  Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, President-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran , stressed the need to end impunity for the Iranian regime’s leaders, emphasizing accountability for their involvement in genocide and crimes against humanity. Mrs. Maryam Rajavi said, “For the past four decades, the regime’s central slogan has been “Death to the Hypocrites.” This chant is echoed without fail at every official ceremony. The term “hypocrite” is the regime’s derogatory reference to the PMOI. In its relations with any country in the world, the regime has declared its most significant red line to be any association with the PMOI. What pr
Read more